Involuntarily Smarter? was run to solve the crisis of whether people have a faster more accurate analysis on what they hear when they control their voluntary actions compared to when they do not control their voluntary actions. The hypothesis for the experiment was that when people control their voluntary actions then they would have a faster more accurate analysis on data then when they do not control their voluntary actions. When the experiment was run the data recieved can prove the hypothesis correct.
The data showed that the amount of words/letters/numbers accurate in each test was greater in average for the group that controlled their voluntary actions compared to the group that did not control their voluntary actions. Also the same can be stated true for the amount of time it took it each group to get the amount of words/numbers/letters right, right. Which means that the group that controlled their voluntary actions had a less average time than the other group. Thus when one calculates the average amount of words/letters/numbers correct per second that a group gets for each test, one can see that the group that controlled their voluntary actions got more words/letters/numbers right per second then the other group. SO one can see that the group that controlled their voluntary actions was more accurate in a less amount of time when compared with the other group that did not control their voluntary actions, thus the hypothesis for this experiment was proven correct.